6 декабря, 2019

Statins protect people aged ≥ 55 years from intracerebral hemorrhage

Knowledge

  • Middle-aged adults and older adults taking statins were at lower risk for both lobar and non-lobar intracerebral hemorrhage (ICB).
  • The benefit increased with the duration of therapy.

Why this matters

  • An association was uncertain based on previous research.
  • The pathophysiology of lobary ICB (predominance of amyloid angiopathy) differs somewhat from that of non-lobar ICB (predominance of atherosclerosis).

Study design

  • Danish population-based retrospective case-control study with persons aged ≥ 55  years:
    • 989  Patients with lobar ICB and 39,500 matching control patients.
    • 1.175  Patients with non-lobar ICB and 46,755 matching control patients.
  • Key Outcome: ICH Risk
  • Funding: Novo Nordisk Foundation
  • 989  Patients with lobar ICB and 39,500 matching control patients.
  • 1.175  Patients with non-lobar ICB and 46,755 matching control patients.

Key Results

  • Compared to non-users, current statin users showed a significant reduction in adjusted risk of 17 % for lobar ICB and a 16 % significant reduction in adjusted risk for non-lobar ICB.
  • The reduction in the risk of lobar ICB increased with duration of statin use (p for  Trend = 0.040): it was <1  Year of application 11 %, for ≥ 1 to <5  years of application 11 % and at ≥ 5 years of application 33 %.
  • The reduction in the risk of non-lobar ICB also increased with the duration of statin use (p for  Trend = 0.001): it was <1  Year of application 0 %, for ≥ 1 to <5  years of application 12 % and at ≥ 5 years of application 38 %.
  • Low- to moderate-intensity statin therapy showed a similar benefit to overall statin therapy (adjusted risk reductions of 18 % and 16 % for lobar and non-lobar ICB), but high-intensity statin therapy showed no significant protection.
  • The results suggested that concomitant use of antihypertensive drugs or oral anticoagulants altered the protective effect of statin therapy.

Limitations

  • The validity of the study was not sufficient to assess the effect of therapy intensity.
  • Data for some potential confounding factors were limited or not available.

This full text is unfortunately reserved for medical professionals

You have reached the maximum number of articles for unregistered visitors

TAGS:
Comments are closed.